Rule

I apologize if missed this in an earlier thread, but can someone explain "turnover point" for me?  What is that in functional terms?  How do you identify it in the taper or stress values of a taper?  (David Bolin)

Turnover pt is simply the point of maximum tip stress. It's the point where the stress curve turns or stops ascending. It is a point on a Garrison or Deflection graph ( not a rod deflection chart). It is of no value except to evaluate an individuals perception of a rod. It is one of the things we can alter with a taper. I just thought it would be interesting to see if people could sense it while casting...some can, some can't. I'm not suggesting that my test rods are of any value at all, they were just my way of establishing some criteria by which rods could be evaluated and stress curves put in some context that people could understand. No doubt there are better ways to do this. It's my naive way to answer the question, " what are the key components of a stress curve."

Or, "If I am looking at a stress curve can I tell if I will like the rod." There is nothing conclusive here, just another little step, I hope. The middle three rods, tip stress, are the ones that test this premise.  (Jerry Foster)

Does this turnover point effect how the line is traveling when cast and if so, how does it affect the line being cast?  Also, it is said that a hinge like Wayne incorporated into his designs, would enable an easier roll cast, how does this happen?  (Ren Monllor)

For me, the closer the turnover point to the tip the tighter the loops but I didn’t like the stiffness it imparted.

For what it’s worth, my new rod is a great roll casting rod without a hinge.  (Jim Lowe)

The further the stress from the tip: IE should throw a wider loop. No it will not effect Roll casting. Its not really a hinge as compared to Wayne's butt hinges it really a different thing here. (Gary Nicholson)

Cool!  Why didn't I think of that?  I suppose that has something to do with being an amateur.  I learn something new every day.

Of the 444 tapers in my research database, the average turnover point (peak stress) is 14 inches from the tip top with an average stress value of 183,000.  That's using Garrison straight stress calculations.  The average values are 26 inches and 102,000 in FlexRod bent stress values.  That doesn't add much to the analysis on average, but the difference between the peak straight and bent stress points can be significant depending on the taper design.

I've added the Turnover point values to the FlexRod statistics view.  I'll try to post the new version for download in the next day or two.  Here's a few Payne tapers with Garrison style stress values:

Estimated

Inches

 

Data

Line

Casting

Peak

from

 

Num

Taper

Wt

Distance

Stress

Tip

 

 

328

Payne Jim 100

4

40

202

10

 

329

Payne Jim 100H

5

50

181

10

 

331

Payne Jim 101

5

50

185

15

 

330

Payne Jim 101

5

50

158

10

 

332

Payne Jim 102

5

50

182

20

 

333

Payne Jim 103

5

50

260

20

 

334

Payne Jim 104

6

60

196

10

 

335

Payne Jim 198

4

40

145

15

 

336

Payne Jim 200

5

50

216

10

 

337

Payne Jim 200H

5

50

194

15

 

338

Payne Jim 200L Rod #1

4

40

198

5

 

502

Payne Jim 200L Rod #2 (Heavier tip)

4

40

201

10

 

503

Payne Jim 200L Rod #2 (Light tip)

4

40

206

5

 

339

Payne Jim 202 Slow Action 1920

5

50

215

20

 

340

Payne Jim 204

6

60

224

10

 

341

Payne Jim 206

6

60

281

5

 

343

Payne Jim 214 7'9" 5/6 wt. Rod #3

6

60

200

55

 

342

Payne Jim 214 Rod #1

6

60

200

55

 

473

Payne Jim 214 Rod #2

6

60

172

40

 

344

Payne Jim 262

4

40

109

10

 

345

Payne Jim 400

8

80

285

15

 

346

Payne Jim 79 6/7 wt.

6

60

135

25

 

347

Payne Jim 95 6' 3/4 wt

2

20

108

10

 

348

Payne Jim 96

3

30

111

20

 

349

Payne Jim 97

4

40

143

5

 

350

Payne Jim 98 rod 1

4

40

127

10

 

351

Payne Jim 98 rod 2

4

40

167

10

 

504

Payne Jim Parabolic 71 4 wt

4

40

139

10

 

353

Payne Jim Parabolic 71 for 3 or 4

4

40

182

5

 

354

Payne Jim Parabolic 76 for 4 or 5

4

40

177

50

 

355

Payne Jim Parabolic 79 for 4 or 5

5

50

119

25

 

356

Payne Jim Parabolic 79 for 6 or 7

6

60

196

50

 

 

I hope I have an opportunity to cast your experimental rod series some day.  I think it would be very interesting.  I'm building a similar experimental series this year.  It's the five standard 7.5’ 5 wt tapers from the research posted on the blog.  I hope to have three of them at SRG this year if I don't spend too much time fishing.  (David Bolin)

Rule

Site Design by: Talsma Web Creations

Tips Home - What's New - Tips - Articles - Tutorials - Contraptions - Contributors - Search Site - Contact Us - Taper Archives
Christmas Missives - Chat Room - Photo Galleries - Line Conversions - The Journey - Extreme Rodmaking - Rodmaker's Pictures - Donate - Store